Monday, September 13, 2010

Watercolours

I've been painting away for day after day or night after night in fact :) and working the day job, hoping to get the new comicbook finished today before work or tonight after work. The old eyes are taking a bashing that's for sure. OO

Monday, September 6, 2010

Truth Check

When asked by a journalist why he didn’t back the Coalition, Tony Windsor admitted with a grin, “because they’d be more likely to win if they did go back to the polls”.
When asked how he could back a government that’s less likely to win, Windsor stated that they’d “be more likely to be here a longer time if they can’t go to the polls and win in a hurry”, with Oakeshot interjecting, “They’ve got more to lose”.
In other words, Oakeshot and Windsor admit they are defying what the nation (including their own conservative electorates) and propping up one of the most incompetent and unstable governments in Australia’s history, which has been massively repudiated by voters, has suffered a savage swing – in seats, first and second preference votes and its legitimacy – in order to preserve their power for as long as possible. 

-Alan RM Jones

76: Not a massive majority... Tony Abbott is set like a jelly now.

Tony Windsor: he is what he looks like, a silly old fart incapable of being a team player and much more enthusiastic to backstab old (ancient in fact) enemies in the Nationals than do what is right.

Oakeshott: he wants a ministry. 30 pieces of silver. Fuckwit.

We'll be back at the polls all too soon.

Sunday, September 5, 2010

You've just entered...

Labor can make stable government... Conservative independents turn on their electorates to make some money and no one calls them on it... Tony Abbott's demonised over fake faults and Gillard's real horrors are ignored... Media bias so obvious that we can only be watching news broadcast live from...


Saturday, September 4, 2010

Doubleplusgood!

George Orwell ends his prophetic novel, 1984, with an “Appendix” devoted to the long-term bureaucratic task of reshaping the English language into “Newspeak” so that by 2050 the tyrants who ruled Oceania would have accomplished a sort of “voluntary” thought control by preventing its people from having even the capacity to formulate, let alone understand, potentially disruptive humanizing concepts that were once commonplace. In the United States this process was put into place in the early 1950s far more subtly and persuasively than even Orwell could have imagined by the Psychology Strategy Board, whose mandate remains classified. Whereas Newspeak deprived those who used it of virtually any conceptual sophistication or nuance, the current rulers of our world have managed to keep intact the capacity for nuance and subtle concept formation, but to selectively deprive those whose welfare is most affected by certain concepts of the capacity to understand their meaning. “Class warfare” is one of those concepts. The ruling class, by contrast, understands perfectly well what this concept means, and wages it ceaselessly.

Friday, September 3, 2010

Put the word quantum in your philosophy and you may be on a nice littler earner. Or, you're a Nazi.

Recently, I read a transcribed lecture by Daniel Quinn, author of the phenomenally successful little book, Ishmael. The title of the lecture was The Great Forgetting. In this talk, Quinn poses a certain problem:
I wonder if you've ever considered how strange it is that the educational and character-shaping structures of our culture expose us but a single time in our lives to the ideas of Socrates, Plato, Euclid, Aristotle, Herodotus, Augustine, Machiavelli, Shakespeare, Descartes, Rousseau, Newton, Racine, Darwin, Kant, Kierkegaard, Tolstoy, Schopenhauer, Goethe, Freud, Marx, Einstein, and dozens of others of the same rank, but expose us annually, monthly, weekly, and even daily to the ideas of persons like Jesus, Moses, Muhammad, and Buddha.
Why is it, do you think, that we need quarterly lectures on charity, while a single lecture on the laws of thermodynamics is presumed to last us a lifetime?
Why is the meaning of Christmas judged to be so difficult of comprehension that we must hear a dozen explications of it, not once in a lifetime, but every single year, year after year after year? Perhaps even more to the point, why do the pious (who already know every word of whatever text they find holy) need to have it repeated to them week after week after week, and even day after day after day? [...]
Have you ever wondered why it is the duty of the clergy of so many sects to read the Divine Office - daily? Why the same affirmations of faith are repeated word for word in so many religious communities around the world - daily?
Is it so difficult to remember that Allah is One or that Christ died for our sins that it must be reiterated at least once every day throughout life? [...]
Anywhere in the world, East or West, you can walk up to a stranger and say, "Let me show you how to be saved," and you'll be understood. You may not be believed or welcomed when you speak these words, but you will surely be understood.
The fact that you'll be understood should astonish you, but it doesn't, because you've been prepared from childhood by a hundred thousand voices - a million voices - to understand these words yourself.
You know instantly what it means to be "saved," and it doesn't matter in the least whether you believe in the salvation referred to.
You know in addition, as a completely distinct matter, that being saved involves some method or other. The method might be a ritual-baptism, extreme unction, the sacrament of penance, the performance of ceremonial works, or anything at all.
It might, on the other hand, be an inner action of repentance, love, faith, or meditation.
Again in addition, and again as a completely distinct matter, you know that the method of salvation being proposed is universal: It can be used by everyone and works for everyone.
Yet again: You know that the method has not been discovered, developed, or tested in any scientific laboratory; either God has revealed it to someone or someone has discovered it in a supranormal state of consciousness. Although initially received by divine means, the method is nonetheless transmittable by normal means, which explains why it's possible for a perfectly ordinary individual to be offering the method to others. [...]
But all this barely scratches the surface of what is meant when someone says, "Let me show you how to be saved."
A complex and profound worldview is implicit in such a statement.
According to this worldview, the human condition is such that everyone is born in an unsaved state and remains unsaved until the requisite ritual or inner action is performed, and all who die in this state either lose their chance for eternal happiness with God or fail to escape the weary cycle of death and rebirth.
Because we've been schooled from birth to understand all this, we're not at all puzzled to hear someone say, "Let me show you how to be saved." Salvation is as plain and ordinary to us as sunrise or rainfall.
But now try to imagine how these words would be received in a culture that had no notion that people were born in an unsaved state, that had no notion that people need to be saved. A statement like this, which seems plain and ordinary to us, would be completely meaningless and incomprehensible to them, in part and in whole. Not a word of it would make sense to them.
Imagine all the work you'd have to do to prepare the people of this culture for your statement. You'd have to persuade them that they (and indeed all humans) are born in a state in which they require salvation. You'd have to explain to them what being unsaved means - and what being saved means. You'd have to persuade them that achieving salvation is vitally important - indeed the most important thing in the world. You'd have to convince them that you have a method that assures success. You'd have to explain where the method came from and why it works. You'd have to assure them that they can master this method, and that it will work as well for them as it does for you. [...]